Kew Cottages: Scheme no longer viable

Welcome to kew.org.au	Make a statement in a 4Kew T-shirt - Click here to order -

The proposed Apartment Building on Lot 76 should, therefore, either be relocated to one of the approved locations shown in the Approved Concept Plan, or the Applicant may wish to otherwise amend their Application to properly comply with prior Approvals.

Lot 77.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because:

The land in question is clearly identified in the P9639 Approved Concept Plan as undivided open space.

The land is in a critical location at the junction of Main Drive and Lower Drive, where it provides a major contribution to the historic significance of the Cottages heritage landscape.

The proposed Lot should, therefore, either be redesigned to accord with the Approved Concept Plan, or the Applicant may wish to withdraw their application, and then proceed to seek approval for a new Concept Plan for both Stage 2 and the Balance of the Site (Stage 3-7).

Lot 78.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because:

The land in question is clearly identified in the P9639 Approved Concept Plan as undivided open space.

The land is in a critical location at the junction of Main Drive and Lower Drive, where it provides a major contribution to the historic significance of the Cottages heritage landscape.

Lot 79.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because:

The land in question is clearly identified in the P9639 Approved Concept Plan as undivided open space, and

The land is in a critical location at the junction of Main Drive and Lower Drive, where it provides a major contribution to the historic significance of the Cottages heritage landscape.

The proposed Lot must also be redesigned in order to preserve and protect the Blackwood Tree 823 (Acacia melanoxylon) , identified by DSE (P. Watkinson, Letter to L. Pereira DPCD 4-Feb 2008 Re: Permit 2007638 ) as indigenous to the area and therefore to be retained under the Flora & Fauna Act:

"The Department therefore considers that the above trees are indigenous and therefore should be avoided, as per the Victoria's Native Vegetation Management - A Framework For Action. As the Responsible Authority, the Department of Planning And Community Development should ensure this occurs."

Lot 80.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because:

The land in question is clearly identified in the P9639 Approved Concept Plan as undivided open space.

The land is in a critical location at the junction of Main Drive and Lower Drive, where it provides a major contribution to the historic significance of the Cottages heritage landscape.

The proposed Lot must also be redesigned in order to preserve and protect the Blackwood Trees 758A, 758B, 758C (Acacia melanoxylon) , identified by DSE (P.Watkinson, Letter to L. Pereira DPCD 4-Feb 2008 Re: Permit 2007638 ) as indigenous to the area and therefore to be retained under the Flora & Fauna Act.

"The Department therefore considers that the above trees are indigenous and therefore should be avoided, as per the Victoria's Native Vegetation Management - A Framework For Action. As the Responsible Authority, the Department of Planning And Community Development should ensure this occurs."

Lot 81.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because it is significantly smaller than the proposed lot as shown at this location in the endorsed Concept Plan.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size of the approved lot.

This is significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

Lot 82.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size of the approved lot.

This is significant because of the very large number of 13 additional lots now proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan (ie: actual BEP not the 'draft BEP provided), drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs fparticulary with regard to the impact on Tree 773 for this lot.

Lot 83.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size of the approved lot.

This is significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs for this lot, particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 68 and 773.

Lot 84.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because it is significantly shallower than the proposed lot as shown at this location in the endorsed Concept Plan.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because shallower blocks along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the southern boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot., particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 61, 63, 66, and 67.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

This is significant because the Applicant has agreed "it is also appropriate that the protection of any tree along Main Drive be covenanted to ensure development of the adjoining lots is not detrimental to their long term health (S.5.1 Subdivisional area and layout), and Heritage Victoria has identified the need for the 173 Agreement to protect the heritage registered trees on Main Drive by way of Condition on Permit P13278.

However, the S.173 Agreement that applies to existing lots bordering the Main Drive heritage registered trees binds the the Purchaser and his successors, "...not to subdivide the land into lots less than 700 square metres in area...", whereas this Application now appears to propose a smaller lot size of 607 square metres.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 85.

This irregularly shaped 'triangular' Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because it appears to have been truncated to accommodate a number of new lots not shown at this location in the endorsed Concept Plan.

This is significant because the new lots are shown located on a cul-de-sac road called Linaker Place.

However, this road layout is not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan. There are no cul-de-sacs at all in the Approved Concept Plan

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to change the Concept Plan in the manner proposed.

This is significant because irregular shaped blocks along Main Drive designed to support higher density development will pose an increased threat to the historic trees within the lots themselves, and on the boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plans, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot., particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 68, 70,71,73, 77,332, and 295 (replanting) , .

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 86.

This irregularly shaped 'pentagon' Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because it appears to have been truncated to accommodate a number of new lots not shown at this location in the endorsed Concept Plan.

This is significant because the new lots are shown located on two cul-de-sacs road called Guest Close and Linaker Place.

This road layout is not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan. There are no cul-de-sacs at all in the Approved Concept Plan.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to change the Concept Plan in the manner proposed.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plans, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot., particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 73, 75,76, and 776A .

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 87.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because shallower blocks along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the southern boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to the impact on Tree 79.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 88.

The proposed Lot is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 because it is significantly smaller and shallower than the proposed lot as shown at this location in the endorsed Concept Plan.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size and depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because increased building density along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the avenue of historic trees, and the need for a new concept plan to properly address heritage landscape issues such as irrigation, excavation, benching, footpaths, parking, and traffic management

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot., particularly with regard to the impact on Tree 79.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 89.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size and depth of the approved lot.

It appears to be simply designed to increase the commercial yield from the site by increasing building density beyond that approved in the Concept Plan.

This is significant because increased building density along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the avenue of historic trees.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 90.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the size and depth of the approved lot.

It appears to be simply designed to increase the commercial yield from the site by increasing building density beyond that approved in the Concept Plan.

This is significant because increased building density along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the avenue of historic trees.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

Lot 91.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because shallower blocks along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the southern boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 134 and 134B.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 92.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because shallower blocks along Main Drive will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the southern boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to the impact on Trees 134, 134B, 136, 136A.

The proposed Lot located on the Northern Boundary of the Main Drive Avenue of trees is also not in accord with the Section 173 Agreement that applies to Lots on the Southern Boundary.

The Application must therefore be amended to comply with the S.173 Agreement and increase the size of this lot to 700 square metres or more.

Lot 93.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Guest Close.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Approved Concept Plan clearly shows a road plan based on six new through roads in Stage 2. The roads shown serve to connect Main Drive, Lower Drive, and the heritage core/open space 'park' located on the western border of Stage 2.

There are no cul-de-sacs shown in Stage 2 on the Approved Concept Plan

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

This is significant because the Approved Concept Plan was based on evidence as to the need to maintain a high level of pedestrian and disabled access within the site, and the historic design of the landscape that facilitated this access.

The proposed Lot and cul-de-sac must, therefore, either be redesigned to accord with the Approved Concept Plan, or the Applicant may wish to withdraw their application, and then proceed to seek approval for a new Concept Plan for both Stage 2 and the Balance of the Site (Stage 3-7).

Lot 94.

The proposed Lot is located on the corner of a proposed cul-de-sac, called Guest Close.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 95.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant because shallower blocks will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the boundary of those lots.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot., particularly with regard to the impact on Tree 414

Lot 96.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

This is significant given problems already experienced in Stage 1 irrigation systems, because shallower blocks will pose an increased threat to the historic trees on the site as a whole due to an overall reduction in the permeable areas, and natural irrigation.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot.

Lot 97.

The proposed Lot is located on the corner of a proposed cul-de-sac, ironically called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 98.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 99.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 100.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 101.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 102.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 103.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 104.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 105.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 106.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 107.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 108.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

The proposed Lot must also be redesigned in order to preserve and protect the Black Sheoak Tree 335 (Allocasuarina littoralis) , identified by DSE (P. Watkinson, Letter to L. Pereira DPCD 4-Feb 2008 Re: Permit 2007638 ) as indigenous to the area and therefore to be retained under the Flora & Fauna Act:

"The Department therefore considers that the above trees are indigenous and therefore should be avoided, as per the Victoria's Native Vegetation Management - A Framework For Action. As the Responsible Authority, the Department of Planning And Community Development should ensure this occurs."

Lot 109.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 110.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 112.

The proposed Lot is located on a proposed cul-de-sac, called Linaker Place, after the landscape architect of that name.

The cul-de-sac, however, is not in accord with Heritage Victoria's Approved Concept Plan for the Kew Cottages Development, as endorsed on 9-Sep 2005 (P.9639)

The Lot is, therefore, not in accord with the Approved Concept Plan.

Lot 113.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is also significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot

Lot 114.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot

Lot 115.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot

Lot 116.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot

Lot 117.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot

Lot 118.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to potential impact on Tree 289.

Lot 119.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to potential impact on Tree 291.

Lot 120.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot particularly with regard to potential impact on Trees 291 and 293.

Lot 121.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot particularly with regard to potential impact on Trees 293 and 294.

Lot 122.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot particularly with regard to potential impact on Trees 294 and 299.

Lot 123.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot particularly with regard to potential impact on Trees 299.

Lot 124.

The Application contains inadequate information to substantiate the need to reduce the depth of the approved lot.

It is particularly significant because of the very large number of additional lots proposed in the Application ie: an increase of over 33% from a total of 36 lots to 49 lots in Stage 2.

The Application must therefore be amended to provide detailed information on the proposed variation and associated heritage landscape impact issues, including the proposed Building Envelope Plan, benching, excavation, drainage, water re-cycling, footpaths, parking, cross-overs, etc for this lot, particularly with regard to potential impact on Tree 301.

====

Endnote: Online Supplementary and supporting material available on www.kew.org.au

Kew Cottages Coalition Objection to Application Jan 2009